York Region paramedic fired over Israel comments speaks out, wants to know if politicians played role

A York Region paramedic who expressed her opposition to Israel’s bombing of Gaza was fired spoke out about the situation and about the grievance against her firing (see https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/york-region-paramedic-politician-comment-1.7598487). (see also, for a videoclip,  https://globalnews.ca/news/11314675/ontario-paramedic-fired-for-criticizing-israel-hopes-to-be-reinstated/?utm_source=chatgpt.com). The report from that link is as follows: 

Julia Alevato · CBC News · 

A York Region paramedic who says she was fired over a social media comment that criticized Israel’s military actions in Gaza says her post was mischaracterized to silence her political opinions. CBC’s Dale Manucdoc explains.

A York Region paramedic who says she was fired over a social media comment that criticized Israel’s military actions in Gaza says she wants to know whether politicians were behind her termination. 

Katherine Grzejszczak said she loves her job, and the comment she made was in line with her “professional obligations” as a paramedic to call for an end to human suffering and for the preservation of life.

“What is hateful is the actions of the Israeli state towards Palestinians, not my descriptions of them,” Grzejszczak said at a news conference on Thursday. 

It is interesting that no one criticizes the following fact and its connection to the limitations of the collective-bargaining process and the resulting limitations of the collective agreement: 

Unan said the union will now begin arbitration with the region, but that could take years – leaving Grzejszczak in limbo.

Years? Justice delayed is often justice denied–especially for members of the working class. Why not start organizing a wildcat strike instead? CUPE, however, uses such cliches as “fair wages” (see Fair Wages: Another Example of the Ideological Rhetoric of Canadian Unions, Part Three: The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) or corporations paying their “fair share of taxes” (see  Another Abstract Slogan or Cliche of Unions: Employers or Corporations Paying Their Fair Share of Taxes, Part Two: The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) ). CUPE seems to be progressive, and its defense of Ms. Grzejszczak is certainly to be commended but also criticized–the form of defending her is to be mainly legal, with token solidarity (real solidarity would involve organizing at work to oppose her firing up to and including a wildcat strike). The legal road is hardly an expression of worker solidarity but rather worker weakness–unless supplemented by organizing efforts on the ground. 

In other words, the problem with CUPE’s support of Ms. Grzejszczak is the form of their solution to the problem, or the manner in which they have chosen to resolve it–in a purely legal manner, with a smattering of civil solidarity that disrupts nothing. 

It will be interesting how long it will take to resolve the issue of her firing. The wheels of “justice” within the legal system can move devastingly slow–unless it requires the iron fist of the capitalist state to oppress recalitrant workers or striking workers. 

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.